Showing posts with label Animal abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Animal abuse. Show all posts

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Is it responsible for a national body to promote irresponsible behaviour?


Directly or indirectly?

http://groups.msn.com/singaporecats/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=16594


Again, I'm filled with that sense of "Not that I want to say ah..."

In Chinese: 不是我要讲啊。。。

In Hokkien: Mmm si wo ai kong ah...

*Triple roll eyes*

Just don't send me to the gallows.

After all, when I was small and cute, YOU picked me to be part of your family.

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

坏女人 vs Film Goddess

Much has been said about the Palin woman, such as her infamous gaffes that she'd committed when she was interviewed about her knowledge on foreign policy (her answer goes along the line of "Alaska is near to Russian and Canada"), but lots have been said about her being an animal- and environmental activists nightmare. Her list of misdemeanor to animals and possible environmental damage is just too long to mention - just do a search for "Sarah Palin and animals" on YouTube and you'll get an idea.

Read : Brigitte Bardot slams Sarah Palin as a 'disgrace to women'


(Chinese translator: 坏女人 means "bad woman")

Friday, October 03, 2008

Animal abuser & killer in the making

What a sad boy, and even sadder parents:


A blank-faced 7-year-old boy broke into a popular Outback zoo, fed a string of animals to the resident crocodile and bashed several lizards to death with a rock, the zoo's director said Friday.

The boy jumped a security fence at the Alice Springs Reptile Center in central Australia early Wednesday, then went on a 30-minute killing spree, using a rock to slay three lizards, including the zoo's beloved, 20-year-old goanna, which he then fed to "Terry," an 11-foot (3.3 meter), 440-pound (200 kilogram) saltwater crocodile, said zoo director Rex Neindorf.


Read: Aussie boy breaks into zoo, feeds animals to croc

Poor animals.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

9,300 pets abandoned by owners

ST 27 Sep 2008

9,300 pets dumped in just 1 year
SPCA teaming up with animal welfare group to educate owners in exhibition

By Judith Tan & Liaw Wy-Cin

'BARKING too much.'

'Too hyperactive.'

'The maid is gone.'

These are some of the silliest reasons pet owners have offered for dumping their furry friends, said Ms Deirdre Moss, the executive officer of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) here.

But they are why 9,328 animals - cats, dogs, rabbits and hamsters - were left at the SPCA between July last year and June this year.

Of this number, more than 3,000 were dogs. And among abandoned dogs, over half were pedigreed.

To stem this flood, the SPCA gives talks at schools - from primary to tertiary - to spread the message about responsible pet ownership.

It is an attempt to tackle the problem at the source - the SPCA lacks the space and resources to care for every animal left at its premises in Mount Vernon Road.

Of the more than 3,000 dogs it received from July last year to June this year, over 2,000 had to be put down.

All licensed pet dogs are required to be micro-chipped, but the SPCA still finds 80 'lost' dogs each month with no information on them.

Barely one in 10 of all animals the society gets is adopted or claimed by owners.

Action for Singapore Dogs (ASD), a non-profit organisation which rescues stray and abandoned dogs, has a no-kill policy, but it has to rely on its network of 20 to 30 dog owners to help look after them temporarily.

The ASD has close to 100 dogs at its adoption centre in Lim Chu Kang and elsewhere.

Its president Ricky Yeo, 40, said: 'Many of these dogs are abandoned when young couples move on to start a family or break up.

'Couples will fight over the house, but no one wants the dog. One was even tossed out from a moving car.'

The Cat Welfare Society, a charity run almost entirely by volunteers, said many cats are dumped on the streets when they outgrow their 'kitten cuteness'.

Said committee member Ang Li Tin: 'There are many who take stray cats home, let them roam and mate with other cats in the area, and then dump the kittens in carparks or dumpsters.

'The kittens either starve, get abused or survive on the streets, while contributing to more cats being born to live on the streets.'

Mr Goh Shih Yong, a spokesman for the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority, said the only long-term solution is to teach people responsible pet ownership.

Many people are willing to pay between $650 and $2,000 for Maltese puppies 'because they are cute, white and fluffy'.

But this breed ranks high in the statistics of dumped pedigree dogs - 106 went unclaimed in the first eight months of this year.

'Education is key to arresting the pet abandonment and stray animal problem in the long run,' Mr Goh said.

The message is getting through to at least some tertiary students, who have stepped forward to promote animal welfare.

People for Animal Welfare (PAW), formed in 2005 by a group at the Singapore Management University, is doing just this.

It will team up with the SPCA to mount an exhibition on the issue at the East Coast Parkway on World Animal Day on Oct 5.

There will also be a photo gallery of animals available for adoption. T-shirts and calendars will be on sale to raise funds for the society.

Ms Moss said: 'Because we take in so many animals, we are not able to find homes for all of them. Keeping a pet is a life-time commitment, and not just for the novelty.'

(Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/Singapore/Story/STIStory_282999.html)

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Cats Do Not Scratch Cars


Cats who sleep on cars risk getting complaints, and if they sleep under cars, they risk getting burnt by the hot exhaust pipe, as Fennie had in this video. She has a wound at the nape of her neck.


Clicky here: Cats DO NOT scratch cars


Thursday, April 10, 2008

Plight of abandoned & unsterilised cats - TNP

The Electric New Paper, 9 April 2008

Plight of abandoned & unsterilised cats

ON Friday morning, as I was walking towards the clinic where I work, I spotted a tiny black kitten, small enough to sit in the palm of my hand.

It was skinny, hungry and so thirsty that it was lapping up water that flowed out from the washing of a rubbish chute.

I noticed an inflamed backside. The kitten was trusting enough to let me pick it up so that I could examine its anal region.

To my horror, the anus was almost completely covered with tiny maggots!

The few cats seen regularly in the vicinity of the clinic are all sterilised, as indicated by a small surgical cut on the tip of the left ear.

This meant the kitten was almost certainly abandoned by an irresponsible cat owner.

It would have been slowly eaten alive by the maggots if I had not seen it then.

The kitten was subsequently handed over to a friend, who is taking it to the vet and seeing to its re-homing.

Abandoned cats and kittens often suffer terribly. I strongly appeal to all cat owners to sterilise their cats.

I suggest that the town councils and the Housing Development Board work with organisations such as the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the Cat Welfare Society to formulate effective grassroots methods to bring the message of sterilisation to owners of cats.

These methods can include posters, offer of subsidised sterilisation to poor families, and organisation of ‘cat parties’ to inform and educate cat owners.

Dr Tan Chek Wee

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Human folly & animal suffering

Yet another example of foolish Singaporean / human behaviour that causes suffering to the animals.

Article #1 : Straits Times Review - March 25, 2008

How macaques and humans can live together
By Michael D. Gumert, For The Straits Times

PEOPLE come to Singapore for many reasons - the glitz, the shopping malls, the food, the entertainment, the conveniences. When I moved to Singapore, it was for none of these reasons.

I came to learn about a small population of long-tailed macaques that live in the few forest patches that remain on this once lushly forested island.

The Victorian naturalist and co-discoverer of the theory of evolution Alfred Russel Wallace once said that Singapore was one of the most species-rich locations in Southeast Asia. Today, Singapore's rainforests are nearly gone and there's a new forest canopy of concrete, glass and steel. This human jungle has sprawled all over the small island, bio-diversity has been replaced with market diversity, and the space for one of our simian cousins, the long-tailed macaque, is dwindling.

That scarcity of space has sparked conflict between humans and macaques. And the humans are 'hitting back' in response to macaque food raids.

Recently, a few residents near Bukit Timah decided to catch macaques on their own and, according to The New Paper, the Agri-food and Veterinary Authority provided them with a trap. The trappers succeeded: They captured a baby macaque!

Naturally, the other macaques got mad and the humans became hysterical. This agitated the macaques even more and a simian rumble ensued.

Media reports of the event contained several alleged facts that struck me - a primatologist who has studied the long-tailed macaque for 10 years - as odd.

First, the macaques were said to have bared their teeth in a sign of aggression. But this display is known as the 'fear grin'. Macaques don't display such a grin when they are about to attack; they display it when they are surrendering. The grin is similar to the fake smiles that humans show sometimes, assuring their superiors they know their place.

Also odd was the report of a fear-grinning macaque chasing humans into their bedroom. Macaques just don't run full speed into unfamiliar places unless forced.

Finally, the reports claimed the macaques were howling. Macaques don't howl. They grunt, scream and bark but they don't howl.

The media reports would seem to have been exaggerated. They probably reflected how 'terrorised' people perceived things rather than reality. Moreover, it is altogether likely that humans helped provoke the simian riot by acting inappropriately in a dangerous situation.


First rule when faced with a dangerous macaque situation: Remain calm. The more emotional and distraught one becomes, the more agitated macaques get.

Second rule: When macaques are riled up, it's best to move slowly. Do not turn your back on them. Stand your ground, but don't stare.

Macaques rarely make contact aggression while you face them. If you turn and run, you may get chased.

So if you get into a stand- off with a macaque, walk backwards slowly but keep facing the assailant. Turn only when you are about 5-6m away from the macaque, and then walk away briskly. Check if the animal is following you. If it is, and you cannot get away quickly enough, turn and face the animal again.

Imagine if I trapped my neighbour's children because they had been disturbing me. Would you feel bad if the father slugged me and took his children back? I would think not.

So why would humans be surprised when macaques get mad when their infants are trapped? In many ways, their reaction shows courage.

How many creatures stand up to formidable foes to protect their kind? How many would not turn tail and run in the face of danger, as the 'terrorised' humans did when the macaques revolted?

As a whole, macaques stand little chance against humans. But if the situation demands it, they do stand up. One has to respect them for that - and learn how not to trigger macaque revolts.

We are lucky no one was hurt in this poorly planned 'hit back' against the food-raiding macaques. The surest way to get a macaque to attack a human is to mishandle its young. This recent simian rumble could have been avoided with different tactics.

Even to watch macaques in behavioural research, scholars must obtain ethics approval and park permits. So why were inexperienced residents provided with equipment and permitted to capture macaques? They endangered themselves and others in their communities. Monkey revolts are far more dangerous than monkey food raids.

How do we avoid conflicts with macaques? One key is urban planning. Building homes at forest fringes causes difficulties. People living near forests all over the world face wildlife problems. White-tailed deer eat ornamental plants in the United States, elephants trample houses in Africa and macaques raid homes in Singapore. All this happens mostly within 200m of forests. The only way not to get into conflicts with macaques is not to live near forests.

That does not mean, however, that those who have moved close to forest fringes - because they are nature enthusiasts, perhaps - are doomed to fight endless macaque wars.

First, never feed macaques. Once they know you are a food patch, they will visit you daily. Second, keep your house shut, don't leave food in open places and secure your trash. Lastly, keep large sticks, a hose or water-sprayer and an air horn. You can use any of these to scare macaques away. With a little effort, macaques will learn that your house has little to offer them.

Singapore has 4.5 million people and 1,400 long-tailed macaques. Scientists suggest Singapore's macaques may be distinct from other breeds of long-tailed macaques. Conservation biologists recommend animal populations should be greater than 5,000 to be genetically viable. But a population greater than 500 can be maintained through active management.

The macaque population in Singapore is small but viable. Some countries like Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia have millions of macaques. Maybe nowhere on earth is human-macaque conflict so well controlled as it is in Singapore, thanks to the National Parks Board's good management.

Most Singaporeans are not aware of this, but the species name Macaca fascicularis was coined by none other than Sir Stamford Raffles in 1821. I doubt he would be happy if Singaporeans were to turn the lights off on a species that he officially named.

The writer, a primatologist, is an assistant professor of psychology at the Nanyang Technological University.


Article #2 : Straits Times Free Story
- Dec 31, 2007

They're still feeding the monkeys
NParks may up fine and rope in security firms to nab culprits
By Arti Mulchand

THERE are fines, heaps of signs, and numerous reports about monkeys attacking feeders and picnicking families for food.

Yet many park-goers are oblivious, and seem to think the National Parks Board (NParks) is monkeying around when it tells them not to feed the primates that call the reserves around MacRitchie and Peirce reservoirs home.

Yesterday, barely five metres from a sign asking visitors to 'Stop feeding the monkeys... Fine $250' at Lower Peirce Reservoir, engineer Joseph Ng hung out with his sister, young niece and nephew, and maid, armed with a bag of bananas and small mandarin oranges.

Within seconds, he was surrounded by at least 15 feisty long-tailed macaques, demanding to be fed, with yet more bounding over.

This, just a day after this newspaper reported that monkey-feeders were to blame for a horde of monkeys attacking a food-bearing pregnant woman and her toddler.

'It's just a way to entertain the kids... It's only natural for us to feed them,' Mr Ng said, adding that he did not know feeding the monkeys was an offence. The sign he thought, was just a poster, and the 'fine is too small to read'.

'I didn't see it,' he declared, adamant.

So far this year, 151 people have been caught red-handed and fined. NParks may also up its fine, and rope in security companies to nab more culprits.

Mr Ng was one of the braver feeders - other park-goers were spotted throwing everything from fruit and potato chips to empty crisp packets to the scores of monkeys waiting by the roadside from the safety of their cars.

But just as Mr Ng stated that he knew of the danger - and was therefore more watchful of the primates - a cheeky long-tailed individual jumped up, twice ripping the red plastic bag he was clutching to free the rest of the treats.

According to the experts, feeding the monkeys changes their dietary habits and makes them aggressive when they are denied food.

They search for food outside the forest, recognise vehicles and plastic bags as potential food containers, and often end up invading homes around the nature reserves.

Illegal feedings continue to be the monkey on the back of NParks, sparking problems across the island.

Yesterday, over at MacRitchie Reservoir, one cheeky monkey made off with a packet of Milo drink from a family's picnic spread, and scurried up a tree to quench his thirst.

And then, as Bulgarian violin teacher Veneta Zlatinova, 42, settled down for her picnic with her husband and sons, she was also in for a rude shock.

A long-tailed macaque jumped up on the bench where her son sat and worked through two bags to find a homemade roti prata - filled with cheese no less.

Shocked that the monkeys were so 'fearless', she said perhaps the answer would be for people to simply not take food to the parks at all - whether as feeders, or as visitors.

'First of all people should stop feeding the monkeys... And also, this is their forest, we are in their territory.

'And when they see us eating, they expect the food is theirs too. I have always told my sons not to feed the monkeys, but perhaps we should not be eating in front of them too,' she concluded.

arti@sph.com.sg
SEEING RED: A monkey ripped the red plastic bag engineer Joseph Ng used to hold some bananas and oranges. He was feeding the monkeys at Lower Peirce Reservoir with his sister, niece, nephew, and their maid. -- ST PHOTOS: WONG KWAI CHOW


Friday, March 07, 2008

Pet Peeves - ST Forum 7 March 2008

Two letters published today in the Straits Times Forum page:

NO SEX, PLEASE, THEY'RE CATS

They refuse to accept the fact that cats, unlike human beings, neither enjoy sexual intercourse nor care about creating a family tree.

MISS REBECCA HO SHULING, who agrees with a Forum reader that errant owners are responsible for the cat problem in Housing Board estates. She thinks such owners are either stubborn or ignorant; they refuse to sterilise their cats as they want to give them a 'normal' life and produce offspring to continue the family line



Free-market principle hurts some pedigree dogs

I REFER to the article, '1,521 pedigree dogs dumped' (Feb 28). I was at the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) two weeks ago and was shocked at the number of huskies there.

Why is it inappropriate to impose a restriction on the breed and number of dogs coming in to Singapore? Huskies are cold-climate dogs and Singapore has a tropical climate. How many owners of huskies actually live in landed properties with lots of space for the dogs to run around?
Some points to note:

Young huskies make good pets if given plenty of space to run and play. But their high demand for exercise and activity makes them a poor choice for urban residents;

In more humid regions, huskies are prone to develop ear and related infections;

If several huskies are kept in the same lot, they tend to be vocal, howling and barking at each other and any other dogs in the vicinity unless they are trained to be quiet. In crowded neighbourhoods, this can be a nuisance to neighbours;

Huskies make relatively poor household dogs; and

They may be considered hyperactive by sedate humans, running in circles inside a house when bored or cramped. If left alone in a dwelling for long, they may engage in destructive behaviour out of boredom, mischief or malice.

In drawing up rules, we should consider the welfare of dogs and their suitability in our tropical climate. How many more dogs will be dumped or put to sleep just because their owners suddenly had no time for them or found them too troublesome to care for?

Grace Peh (Mrs)


This is one of my pet peeves as well:

TV licence fee

Why collect this 'tax' when there is enough revenue from TV advertisements to cover costs?

MS YEOH SWEE IMM, who says that the TV licence fee is another form of 'tax'' which should go the way of the recently abolished estate duty. Abolishing the fee will give many Singaporeans, especially poorer ones, access to the educational content television offers

Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/ST+Forum/ST+Forum.html

Friday, October 19, 2007

Animal abuse as art???


I am totally speechless! And angry that no one did anything to help the dog.

If this is art, then puh-leeese, spare me the arty farty nonsense.



Man tortures dog for art.






Where is the humanity?!?